Reporting
We provide companies of all sizes with financial reporting services for stock-based compensation.
Valuation
Get fair value measurement and modeling for all sorts of equity-based awards and securities, whether business as usual or special circumstances.
Complex Securities Valuation
HR Advisory
Our HR advisory services provide the insight you need to improve program design, grant more equity, and tell a cleaner story in your proxy and financial statements.
CEO Pay Ratio
Resources
Dive into our library of publications on a wide range of stock-based compensation topics.
About Us
We’re dedicated to bringing insight, control, and expanded capability to your compensation strategy.
Webinar December 2, 2016 Posted on: 11/07/2016
Relative total shareholder return (rTSR) is far and away the most popular metric for performance-based awards. Despite their prevalence, there are so many ways the grant can go sideways and lead to program failure.
TSR awards add dozens, even hundreds, of moving parts to an already-complicated design and grant process. Some are more visible than others. But even the smallest details can have significant repercussions for downstream administration, financial reporting, and valuation.
Join us on December 2nd for a discussion on the little grant details that can have a big impact on your TSR program. This extensively requested webcast is based on our TSR Design Attributes Checklist, which is an essential tool to both finance and executive compensation professionals dealing with rTSR designs. Attendees will receive a copy of the checklist as part of the webcast.
Featured Panelists:
Topics Include:
Additional Details:
Relative total shareholder return (rTSR) awards are full of complexity and moving parts. This rTSR award checklist helps both executive compensation and accounting leaders spot potential ambiguities and flush out gaps in their award agreements and downstream tracking processes.
Using non-GAAP financial measures to determine incentive payouts can often make a compensation committee’s job easier and yield more logical outcomes. But some measures are more likely than others to garner blowback from shareholders and advisory groups. In this article published on CFO.com, we discuss the motivations for using non-GAAP measures as well as the pitfalls and complications of doing so.